OEProof

24260764 and 24273971: a dealer interchange record is not the same as GM-public supersession

A dealer/EPC record states an interchange between legacy OE 24260764 and 24273971 effective 29 July 2016. That is useful relationship evidence, but it remains dealer/catalog level and does not establish a universal GM-public supersession or ordering rule.

Evidence boundary

B3 E621/E622; dealer/catalog relation only; no universal interchange, no GM-public supersession, no current-ordering instruction.

FAQ

What is actually documented?
A dated dealer/EPC interchange statement: 24260764 with 24273971.
Can this be published as “GM superseded 24260764 by 24273971”?
No. The source class does not support that stronger GM-public wording.
Can it be used as a universal ordering instruction?
No. Preserve the specific application/context and verify the actual vehicle before ordering.

For a specific vehicle, send the VIN / RPO / known OE so the application can be checked in its own context.

Send OE / VIN